Interactive demo: /demo — semantic graph walkthrough
Graph overview: 22 entities · 22 relationships · 66 inferred · answer hops 6
Ontology 20c/26p · Rules 6/7 · Layers conceptual, assertional, inferential, provenance, policy
Should we hold the EUR 185k wire on claim CLM-88421?
Hold the EUR 185k wire on CLM-88421. The beneficiary name does not match Meridian GmbH’s KYC legal name, which triggers Wire Fraud Playbook v4 (§ hold > EUR 50k on mismatch). GDPR Art. 22 requires the Human Oversight Gate before any irreversible deny/release — Claims Triage Agent has prepared the decision but cannot auto-execute.
Provenance path
Claims Case CLM-88421 —references→ KYC Profile — Meridian GmbH
KYC Profile — Meridian GmbH → Wire Fraud Playbook v4
Wire Fraud Playbook v4 → Claims Triage Agent
Claims Triage Agent —requires→ Human Oversight Gate
Human Oversight Gate —evidences→ GDPR Art. 22
Evidence nodes
Claims Case CLM-88421 — Wire dispute: EUR 185k, beneficiary mismatch, KYC flag.
KYC Profile — Meridian GmbH — UBO verified; legal name Meridian GmbH; sanctioned-list clear.
Wire Fraud Playbook v4 — Hold transfers > EUR 50k when beneficiary ≠ KYC legal name.
Human Oversight Gate — Mandatory reviewer before irreversible high-risk actions.
GDPR Art. 22 — Automated decisions need meaningful human oversight.